But one cannot
conceive that even in this way any approximation could have been
made, even in those old mediaeval days, towards a fair proportioning
of the pay to the work. At any rate, it is clear enough that there
is no such approximation now. And what a screech would there not be
among the clergy of the Church, even in these reforming days, if any
over-bold reformer were to suggest that such an approximation should
be attempted? Let those who know clergymen, and like them, and have
lived with them, only fancy it! Clergymen to be paid, not according
to the temporalities of any living which they may have acquired,
either by merit or favour, but in accordance with the work to be
done! O Doddington! and O Stanhope, think of this, if an idea so
sacrilegious can find entrance into your warm ecclesiastical bosoms!
Ecclesiastical work to be bought and paid for according to its
quantity and quality!
But, nevertheless, one may prophesy that we Englishmen must come to
this, disagreeable as the idea undoubtedly is. Most pleasant-minded
Churchmen feel, I think, on this subject pretty much in the same way.
Our present arrangement of parochial incomes is beloved as being
time-honoured, gentleman-like, English, and picturesque. We would
fain adhere to it closely as long as we can, but we know that we do
so by the force of our prejudices, and not by that of our judgement.
Pages:
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262